62b2a71dda
Enable a single LightRAG server instance to serve multiple isolated workspaces via HTTP header-based routing. This allows multi-tenant SaaS deployments where each tenant's data is completely isolated. Key features: - Header-based workspace routing (LIGHTRAG-WORKSPACE, X-Workspace-ID fallback) - Process-local pool of LightRAG instances with LRU eviction - FastAPI dependency (get_rag) for workspace resolution per request - Full backward compatibility - existing deployments work unchanged - Strict multi-tenant mode option (LIGHTRAG_ALLOW_DEFAULT_WORKSPACE=false) - Configurable pool size (LIGHTRAG_MAX_WORKSPACES_IN_POOL) - Graceful shutdown with workspace finalization Configuration: - LIGHTRAG_DEFAULT_WORKSPACE: Default workspace (falls back to WORKSPACE) - LIGHTRAG_ALLOW_DEFAULT_WORKSPACE: Require explicit header when false - LIGHTRAG_MAX_WORKSPACES_IN_POOL: Max concurrent workspace instances (default: 50) Files: - New: lightrag/api/workspace_manager.py (core multi-workspace module) - New: tests/test_multi_workspace_server.py (17 unit tests) - New: render.yaml (Render deployment blueprint) - Modified: All route files to use get_rag dependency - Updated: README.md, env.example with documentation 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
61 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
61 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Multi-Workspace Server Support
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2025-12-01
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
**Status**: All checks passed
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- Verified: No mention of Python, FastAPI, asyncio, or specific libraries
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- Verified: User stories frame from SaaS operator, API client developer, existing user perspectives
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- Verified: Requirements use business language (workspace, tenant, isolation) not code terms
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
- Verified: User Scenarios, Requirements, Success Criteria all present and populated
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- Verified: Zero markers in specification
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- Verified: Each FR has specific, verifiable conditions (e.g., "alphanumeric, hyphens, underscores, 1-64 characters")
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- Verified: SC-001 through SC-007 include specific metrics (5 seconds, 10ms, 50 instances, 100% isolation)
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- Verified: Criteria focus on observable outcomes, not internal implementation
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- Verified: 15 acceptance scenarios across 5 user stories
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- Verified: 5 edge cases with expected behaviors documented
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- Verified: Focused on server-level multi-workspace; leverages existing core isolation
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
- Verified: Assumptions section documents 4 key assumptions
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- Verified: 22 functional requirements, each testable
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- Verified: P1 stories cover isolation and routing; P2 covers compatibility; P3 covers operations
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- Verified: SC maps directly to FR and user stories
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
- Verified: No code patterns, library names, or implementation hints
|
|
|
|
## Validation Result
|
|
|
|
**PASSED** - All 16 checklist items pass validation.
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Specification is ready for `/speckit.plan` phase
|
|
- No clarifications needed - requirements are complete and unambiguous
|
|
- Constitution alignment verified:
|
|
- Principle I (API Backward Compatibility): Addressed by FR-014, FR-015, FR-016, US3
|
|
- Principle II (Workspace Isolation): Core focus of US1, FR-011 through FR-013
|
|
- Principle III (Explicit Configuration): Addressed by FR-020, FR-021, FR-022
|
|
- Principle IV (Test Coverage): SC-007 requires automated isolation tests
|