LightRAG/lightrag/evaluation/README.md
anouarbm 36694eb9f2 fix(evaluation): Move import-time validation to runtime and improve documentation
Changes:
- Move sys.exit() calls from module level to __init__() method
- Raise proper exceptions (ImportError, ValueError, EnvironmentError) instead of sys.exit()
- Add lazy import for RAGEvaluator in __init__.py using __getattr__
- Update README to clarify sample_dataset.json contains generic test data (not personal)
- Fix README to reflect actual output format (JSON + CSV, not HTML)
- Improve documentation for custom test case creation

Addresses code review feedback about import-time validation and module exports.
2025-11-03 05:56:38 +01:00

320 lines
8.2 KiB
Markdown

# 📊 LightRAG Evaluation Framework
RAGAS-based offline evaluation of your LightRAG system.
## What is RAGAS?
**RAGAS** (Retrieval Augmented Generation Assessment) is a framework for reference-free evaluation of RAG systems using LLMs.
Instead of requiring human-annotated ground truth, RAGAS uses state-of-the-art evaluation metrics:
### Core Metrics
| Metric | What It Measures | Good Score |
|--------|-----------------|-----------|
| **Faithfulness** | Is the answer factually accurate based on retrieved context? | > 0.80 |
| **Answer Relevance** | Is the answer relevant to the user's question? | > 0.80 |
| **Context Recall** | Was all relevant information retrieved from documents? | > 0.80 |
| **Context Precision** | Is retrieved context clean without irrelevant noise? | > 0.80 |
| **RAGAS Score** | Overall quality metric (average of above) | > 0.80 |
---
## 📁 Structure
```
lightrag/evaluation/
├── eval_rag_quality.py # Main evaluation script
├── sample_dataset.json # Generic LightRAG test cases (not personal data)
├── __init__.py # Package init
├── results/ # Output directory
│ ├── results_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS.json # Raw metrics in JSON
│ └── results_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS.csv # Metrics in CSV format
└── README.md # This file
```
**Note:** `sample_dataset.json` contains **generic test questions** about LightRAG features (RAG systems, vector databases, deployment, etc.). This is **not personal portfolio data** - you can use these questions directly to test your own LightRAG installation.
---
## 🚀 Quick Start
### 1. Install Dependencies
```bash
pip install ragas datasets langfuse
```
Or use your project dependencies (already included in pyproject.toml):
```bash
pip install -e ".[offline-llm]"
```
### 2. Run Evaluation
```bash
cd /path/to/LightRAG
python -m lightrag.evaluation.eval_rag_quality
```
Or directly:
```bash
python lightrag/evaluation/eval_rag_quality.py
```
### 3. View Results
Results are saved automatically in `lightrag/evaluation/results/`:
```
results/
├── results_20241023_143022.json ← Raw metrics in JSON format
└── results_20241023_143022.csv ← Metrics in CSV format (for spreadsheets)
```
**Results include:**
- ✅ Overall RAGAS score
- 📊 Per-metric averages (Faithfulness, Answer Relevance, Context Recall, Context Precision)
- 📋 Individual test case results
- 📈 Performance breakdown by question
---
## 📝 Test Dataset
The included `sample_dataset.json` contains **generic example questions** about LightRAG (RAG systems, vector databases, deployment, etc.). **This is NOT personal data** - it's meant as a template.
**Important:** You should **replace these with test questions based on YOUR data** that you've injected into your RAG system.
### Creating Your Own Test Cases
Edit `sample_dataset.json` with questions relevant to your indexed documents:
```json
{
"test_cases": [
{
"question": "Question based on your documents",
"ground_truth": "Expected answer from your data",
"context": "topic_category"
}
]
}
```
**Example (for a technical portfolio):**
```json
{
"question": "Which projects use PyTorch?",
"ground_truth": "The Neural ODE Project uses PyTorch with TorchODE library for continuous-time neural networks.",
"context": "ml_projects"
}
```
---
## 🔧 Integration with Your RAG System
Currently, the evaluation script uses **ground truth as mock responses**. To evaluate your actual LightRAG:
### Step 1: Update `generate_rag_response()`
In `eval_rag_quality.py`, replace the mock implementation:
```python
async def generate_rag_response(self, question: str, context: str = None) -> Dict[str, str]:
"""Generate RAG response using your LightRAG system"""
from lightrag import LightRAG
rag = LightRAG(
working_dir="./rag_storage",
llm_model_func=your_llm_function
)
response = await rag.aquery(question)
return {
"answer": response,
"context": "context_from_kg" # If available
}
```
### Step 2: Run Evaluation
```bash
python lightrag/evaluation/eval_rag_quality.py
```
---
## 📊 Interpreting Results
### Score Ranges
- **0.80-1.00**: ✅ Excellent (Production-ready)
- **0.60-0.80**: ⚠️ Good (Room for improvement)
- **0.40-0.60**: ❌ Poor (Needs optimization)
- **0.00-0.40**: 🔴 Critical (Major issues)
### What Low Scores Mean
| Metric | Low Score Indicates |
|--------|-------------------|
| **Faithfulness** | Responses contain hallucinations or incorrect information |
| **Answer Relevance** | Answers don't match what users asked |
| **Context Recall** | Missing important information in retrieval |
| **Context Precision** | Retrieved documents contain irrelevant noise |
### Optimization Tips
1. **Low Faithfulness**:
- Improve entity extraction quality
- Better document chunking
- Tune retrieval temperature
2. **Low Answer Relevance**:
- Improve prompt engineering
- Better query understanding
- Check semantic similarity threshold
3. **Low Context Recall**:
- Increase retrieval `top_k` results
- Improve embedding model
- Better document preprocessing
4. **Low Context Precision**:
- Smaller, focused chunks
- Better filtering
- Improve chunking strategy
---
## 📈 Usage Examples
### Python API
```python
import asyncio
from lightrag.evaluation import RAGEvaluator
async def main():
evaluator = RAGEvaluator()
results = await evaluator.run()
# Access results
for result in results:
print(f"Question: {result['question']}")
print(f"RAGAS Score: {result['ragas_score']:.2%}")
print(f"Metrics: {result['metrics']}")
asyncio.run(main())
```
### Custom Dataset
```python
evaluator = RAGEvaluator(test_dataset_path="custom_tests.json")
results = await evaluator.run()
```
### Batch Evaluation
```python
from pathlib import Path
import json
results_dir = Path("lightrag/evaluation/results")
results_dir.mkdir(exist_ok=True)
# Run multiple evaluations
for i in range(3):
evaluator = RAGEvaluator()
results = await evaluator.run()
```
---
## 🎯 Using Evaluation Results
**What the Metrics Tell You:**
1.**Quality Metrics**: Overall RAGAS score indicates system health
2.**Evaluation Framework**: Automated quality assessment with RAGAS
3.**Best Practices**: Offline evaluation pipeline for continuous improvement
4.**Production-Ready**: Metrics-driven system optimization
**Example Use Cases:**
- Track RAG quality over time as you update your documents
- Compare different retrieval modes (local, global, hybrid, mix)
- Measure impact of chunking strategy changes
- Validate system performance before deployment
---
## 🔗 Related Features
- **LangFuse Integration**: Real-time observability of production RAG calls
- **LightRAG**: Core RAG system with entity extraction and knowledge graphs
- **Metrics**: See `results/` for detailed evaluation metrics
---
## 📚 Resources
- [RAGAS Documentation](https://docs.ragas.io/)
- [RAGAS GitHub](https://github.com/explodinggradients/ragas)
- [LangFuse + RAGAS Guide](https://langfuse.com/guides/cookbook/evaluation_of_rag_with_ragas)
---
## 🐛 Troubleshooting
### "ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ragas'"
```bash
pip install ragas datasets
```
### "No sample_dataset.json found"
Make sure you're running from the project root:
```bash
cd /path/to/LightRAG
python lightrag/evaluation/eval_rag_quality.py
```
### "LLM API errors during evaluation"
The evaluation uses your configured LLM (OpenAI by default). Ensure:
- API keys are set in `.env`
- Have sufficient API quota
- Network connection is stable
### Results showing 0 scores
Current implementation uses ground truth as mock responses. Results will show perfect scores because the "generated answer" equals the ground truth.
**To use actual RAG results:**
1. Implement the `generate_rag_response()` method
2. Connect to your LightRAG instance
3. Run evaluation again
---
## 📝 Next Steps
1. ✅ Review test dataset in `sample_dataset.json`
2. ✅ Run `python lightrag/evaluation/eval_rag_quality.py`
3. ✅ Open the HTML report in browser
4. 🔄 Integrate with actual LightRAG system
5. 📊 Monitor metrics over time
6. 🎯 Use insights for optimization
---
**Happy Evaluating! 🚀**