LightRAG/reproduce/batch_eval.py
clssck 082a5a8fad test(lightrag,api): add comprehensive test coverage and S3 support
Add extensive test suites for API routes and utilities:
- Implement test_search_routes.py (406 lines) for search endpoint validation
- Implement test_upload_routes.py (724 lines) for document upload workflows
- Implement test_s3_client.py (618 lines) for S3 storage operations
- Implement test_citation_utils.py (352 lines) for citation extraction
- Implement test_chunking.py (216 lines) for text chunking validation
Add S3 storage client implementation:
- Create lightrag/storage/s3_client.py with S3 operations
- Add storage module initialization with exports
- Integrate S3 client with document upload handling
Enhance API routes and core functionality:
- Add search_routes.py with full-text and graph search endpoints
- Add upload_routes.py with multipart document upload support
- Update operate.py with bulk operations and health checks
- Enhance postgres_impl.py with bulk upsert and parameterized queries
- Update lightrag_server.py to register new API routes
- Improve utils.py with citation and formatting utilities
Update dependencies and configuration:
- Add S3 and test dependencies to pyproject.toml
- Update docker-compose.test.yml for testing environment
- Sync uv.lock with new dependencies
Apply code quality improvements across all modified files:
- Add type hints to function signatures
- Update imports and router initialization
- Fix logging and error handling
2025-12-05 23:13:39 +01:00

143 lines
5.1 KiB
Python

import json
import logging
import re
from pathlib import Path
import jsonlines
from openai import OpenAI
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
def batch_eval(query_file, result1_file, result2_file, output_file_path, client: OpenAI | None = None):
client = client or OpenAI()
for path in (query_file, result1_file, result2_file):
if not Path(path).is_file():
raise FileNotFoundError(f'Input file not found: {path}')
try:
with open(query_file, encoding='utf-8') as f:
data = f.read()
except Exception as exc:
logger.error(f'Failed to read query file {query_file}: {exc}')
raise
queries = re.findall(r'- Question \d+: (.+)', data)
try:
with open(result1_file, encoding='utf-8') as f:
answers1 = json.load(f)
with open(result2_file, encoding='utf-8') as f:
answers2 = json.load(f)
except Exception as exc:
logger.error(f'Failed to load result files: {exc}')
raise
answers1 = [i['result'] for i in answers1]
answers2 = [i['result'] for i in answers2]
requests = []
for i, (query, answer1, answer2) in enumerate(zip(queries, answers1, answers2, strict=True)):
sys_prompt = """
---Role---
You are an expert tasked with evaluating two answers to the same question based on three criteria: **Comprehensiveness**, **Diversity**, and **Empowerment**.
"""
prompt = f"""
You will evaluate two answers to the same question based on three criteria: **Comprehensiveness**, **Diversity**, and **Empowerment**.
- **Comprehensiveness**: How much detail does the answer provide to cover all aspects and details of the question?
- **Diversity**: How varied and rich is the answer in providing different perspectives and insights on the question?
- **Empowerment**: How well does the answer help the reader understand and make informed judgments about the topic?
For each criterion, choose the better answer (either Answer 1 or Answer 2) and explain why. Then, select an overall winner based on these three categories.
Here is the question:
{query}
Here are the two answers:
**Answer 1:**
{answer1}
**Answer 2:**
{answer2}
Evaluate both answers using the three criteria listed above and provide detailed explanations for each criterion.
Output your evaluation in the following JSON format:
{{
"Comprehensiveness": {{
"Winner": "[Answer 1 or Answer 2]",
"Explanation": "[Provide explanation here]"
}},
"Diversity": {{
"Winner": "[Answer 1 or Answer 2]",
"Explanation": "[Provide explanation here]"
}},
"Empowerment": {{
"Winner": "[Answer 1 or Answer 2]",
"Explanation": "[Provide explanation here]"
}},
"Overall Winner": {{
"Winner": "[Answer 1 or Answer 2]",
"Explanation": "[Summarize why this answer is the overall winner based on the three criteria]"
}}
}}
"""
request_data = {
'custom_id': f'request-{i + 1}',
'method': 'POST',
'url': '/v1/chat/completions',
'body': {
'model': 'gpt-4o-mini',
'messages': [
{'role': 'system', 'content': sys_prompt},
{'role': 'user', 'content': prompt},
],
},
}
requests.append(request_data)
output_dir = Path(output_file_path).parent
output_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
with jsonlines.open(output_file_path, mode='w') as writer:
for request in requests:
writer.write(request)
logger.info(f'Batch API requests written to {output_file_path}')
try:
with open(output_file_path, 'rb') as f:
batch_input_file = client.files.create(file=f, purpose='batch')
batch_input_file_id = batch_input_file.id
batch = client.batches.create(
input_file_id=batch_input_file_id,
endpoint='/v1/chat/completions',
completion_window='24h',
metadata={'description': 'nightly eval job'},
)
except Exception as exc:
logger.error(f'Error creating batch from {output_file_path}: {exc}')
raise
logger.info(f'Batch {batch.id} has been created.')
if __name__ == '__main__':
import argparse
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument('--query_file', type=str, required=True, help='Path to file containing evaluation queries')
parser.add_argument('--result1_file', type=str, required=True, help='Path to JSON file with first set of answers')
parser.add_argument('--result2_file', type=str, required=True, help='Path to JSON file with second set of answers')
parser.add_argument('--output_file_path', type=str, required=True, help='Output path for batch API requests file')
args = parser.parse_args()
batch_eval(args.query_file, args.result1_file, args.result2_file, args.output_file_path)