# Multi-Tenant Implementation Audit - Final Report **Date:** November 29, 2025 **Auditor:** Automated Audit Process **Version:** 1.0 --- ## Executive Summary This audit reviewed the multi-tenant implementation of the LightRAG stack from Web UI through REST API to Storage layer. The implementation uses a **workspace-based isolation model** where `workspace = tenant_id/kb_id`. ### Overall Assessment: ⚠️ FUNCTIONAL WITH CONCERNS The multi-tenant implementation is **functionally correct** but has several security and architectural concerns that should be addressed before production deployment. --- ## Architecture Overview ``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Web UI (React) │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ │ │ TenantStore │ │ KBSelector │ │ Axios Interceptor │ │ │ │ (Zustand) │ │ │ │ X-Tenant-ID Header │ │ │ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ HTTP Headers (X-Tenant-ID, X-KB-ID) │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ REST API (FastAPI) │ │ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ │ │ │ get_tenant_ │ │ TenantContext │ │ TenantRAG │ │ │ │ context() │──│ (dataclass) │──│ Manager │ │ │ │ dependency │ │ │ │ (per-tenant RAG)│ │ │ └──────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ workspace = tenant_id/kb_id │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Storage Layer │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ PostgreSQL Tables with workspace column │ │ │ │ PRIMARY KEY (workspace, id) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ Tables: LIGHTRAG_DOC_FULL, LIGHTRAG_DOC_CHUNKS, │ │ │ │ LIGHTRAG_VDB_*, LIGHTRAG_TENANTS, etc. │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │ │ │ Redis │ │ Apache AGE │ │ Vector Store │ │ │ │ (key prefix) │ │ (graph per ws) │ │ (ws filter) │ │ │ └─────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` --- ## Test Results Summary ### Unit Tests: ✅ ALL PASSED | Test Suite | Tests | Result | |------------|-------|--------| | test_multitenant_e2e.py | 32 | ✅ PASSED | | test_tenant_security.py | 11 | ✅ PASSED | | test_multi_tenant_backends.py | 37 | ✅ PASSED | | test_tenant_storage_phase3.py | 22 | ✅ PASSED | | **TOTAL** | **102** | **✅ ALL PASSED** | ### Key Verifications - ✅ Cross-tenant data access prevention - ✅ Knowledge base isolation within tenants - ✅ Role-based permission enforcement - ✅ Composite key uniqueness - ✅ Redis namespace isolation - ✅ Vector ID uniqueness per tenant --- ## Security Findings ### Critical Findings | ID | Severity | Component | Finding | |----|----------|-----------|---------| | SEC-001 | 🔴 HIGH | API | `get_tenant_context_optional()` allows global RAG fallback | | SEC-002 | 🔴 HIGH | API | Admin user bypass in `tenant_service.py` | | SEC-003 | 🟡 MEDIUM | API | `user_id` parameter optional in RAG manager | | SEC-004 | 🟡 MEDIUM | Storage | No PostgreSQL Row-Level Security (RLS) | | SEC-005 | 🟢 LOW | Storage | Tenant context set for logging only | | SEC-006 | 🟢 LOW | WebUI | localStorage used for token storage | ### SEC-001: Global RAG Fallback (HIGH) **Location:** `lightrag/api/routers/document_routes.py`, `query_routes.py` **Issue:** Using `get_tenant_context_optional` allows requests without tenant headers to use global RAG: ```python async def get_tenant_rag( tenant_context: Optional[TenantContext] = Depends(get_tenant_context_optional) ) -> LightRAG: if rag_manager and tenant_context: return await rag_manager.get_rag_instance(...) return rag # Falls back to global RAG! ``` **Risk:** Data leakage if global RAG contains multi-tenant data. **Recommendation:** Use `get_tenant_context` (required) for all data endpoints in multi-tenant mode. ### SEC-002: Admin User Bypass (HIGH) **Location:** `lightrag/services/tenant_service.py` **Issue:** ```python if user_id.lower() == "admin": return True # Bypass all access checks ``` **Risk:** Any user with username "admin" can access any tenant's data. **Recommendation:** Implement proper super-admin role with separate authentication. ### SEC-003: Optional User ID (MEDIUM) **Location:** `lightrag/tenant_rag_manager.py` **Issue:** `user_id` parameter is optional, allowing access without authentication check. **Recommendation:** Deprecate unauthenticated access path. ### SEC-004: No Row-Level Security (MEDIUM) **Location:** PostgreSQL Tables **Issue:** Tenant isolation relies entirely on application-level `workspace` filtering. No database-level enforcement. **Recommendation:** Enable PostgreSQL RLS as defense-in-depth: ```sql ALTER TABLE LIGHTRAG_DOC_FULL ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY; CREATE POLICY tenant_isolation ON LIGHTRAG_DOC_FULL USING (workspace = current_setting('app.current_workspace')); ``` --- ## Architectural Findings ### ARCH-001: Workspace Encoding **Pattern:** `workspace = "{tenant_id}/{kb_id}"` **Strengths:** - Simple, hierarchical namespace - Clear data ownership - Compatible with file-based storage **Concerns:** - No explicit validation of workspace format - Potential collision if tenant IDs contain `/` ### ARCH-002: Context Propagation **Pattern:** Python `ContextVar` for tenant context ```python tenant_id_var: ContextVar[Optional[str]] = ContextVar("tenant_id") ``` **Current Use:** Set for PostgreSQL session logging, but NOT used for security. **Recommendation:** Use context variable for RLS enforcement. ### ARCH-003: RAG Instance Caching **Pattern:** LRU cache keyed by `(tenant_id, kb_id)` **Strengths:** - Memory efficient - Fast subsequent access **Concerns:** - Cache size limit may cause thrashing with many tenants - No cache invalidation on tenant deletion --- ## Web UI Findings ### UI-001: Tenant State Management **Location:** `lightrag_webui/src/stores/tenant.ts` **Status:** ✅ Well implemented - Zustand store with persistence - Automatic header injection via Axios interceptor - Console logging for debugging ### UI-002: Document State Clearing **Location:** `lightrag_webui/src/features/DocumentManager.tsx` **Recent Fix:** State clearing on tenant/KB change ```typescript useEffect(() => { setCurrentPageDocs([]); setDocs(null); setStatusCounts({ all: 0 }); // ... }, [selectedTenant?.tenant_id, selectedKB?.kb_id]); ``` **Status:** ✅ Fixed (per task log dated 2025-02-25) ### UI-003: Token Storage **Finding:** Authentication token stored in localStorage **Risk:** XSS vulnerability could expose tokens **Recommendation:** Use httpOnly cookies for production --- ## Recommendations ### Priority 1: Critical Security Fixes 1. **Replace `get_tenant_context_optional` with `get_tenant_context`** for all data endpoints 2. **Remove admin bypass** in `tenant_service.py` 3. **Make `user_id` required** in RAG manager ### Priority 2: Defense-in-Depth 4. **Enable PostgreSQL RLS** for all tenant-scoped tables 5. **Validate workspace format** to prevent injection 6. **Add audit logging** for cross-tenant access attempts ### Priority 3: Operational Improvements 7. **Add cache invalidation** on tenant/KB deletion 8. **Implement rate limiting** per tenant 9. **Add metrics/monitoring** for tenant isolation verification --- ## Test Protocol for Manual Verification ### Prerequisites ```bash # Start test databases docker compose -f docker-compose.test-db.yml up -d # Verify containers docker ps --filter "name=lightrag-audit" ``` ### Test Scenarios #### Scenario 1: Cross-Tenant Data Access Prevention 1. Create Tenant A and KB 2. Upload document to Tenant A 3. Attempt to list documents with Tenant B headers 4. **Expected:** Empty list for Tenant B #### Scenario 2: Missing Tenant Header 1. Send document list request without X-Tenant-ID header 2. **Expected:** 400 Bad Request OR empty response (not global data) #### Scenario 3: Query Isolation 1. Insert data into Tenant A KB 2. Query with Tenant B context 3. **Expected:** Query returns no results from Tenant A ### Test Script ```bash # Run API isolation tests python docs/action_plan/multitenant-audit/scripts/test_api_isolation.py ``` --- ## Conclusion The LightRAG multi-tenant implementation provides **functional tenant isolation** through: - Workspace-based table partitioning - Per-tenant RAG instance management - Header-based tenant context extraction - Role-based permission model However, the implementation has **security gaps** that must be addressed: 1. Optional tenant context fallback to global RAG 2. Admin user bypass in access control 3. No database-level security (RLS) ### Recommended Next Steps 1. 🔴 **Immediate:** Fix SEC-001 and SEC-002 before production 2. 🟡 **Short-term:** Enable PostgreSQL RLS 3. 🟢 **Long-term:** Add comprehensive audit logging and monitoring --- ## Appendices ### A. Files Reviewed | Layer | Files | |-------|-------| | Web UI | `tenant.ts`, `client.ts`, `DocumentManager.tsx` | | API | `dependencies.py`, `document_routes.py`, `query_routes.py`, `tenant_routes.py` | | Service | `tenant_service.py`, `tenant_rag_manager.py` | | Storage | `postgres_impl.py`, `utils_context.py`, `namespace.py` | | Tests | `test_multitenant_e2e.py`, `test_tenant_security.py`, `test_multi_tenant_backends.py` | ### B. Test Environment | Component | Version/Config | |-----------|----------------| | Python | 3.12.12 | | PostgreSQL | pgvector/pgvector:pg16 | | Redis | 7-alpine | | OS | macOS (arm64) | ### C. Related Documentation - `docs/0001-multi-tenant-architecture.md` - `docs/0002-multi-tenant-visual-reference.md` - `docs/0003-multi-tenant-documentation-index.md` - `MULTITENANT_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md`