# Multi-Tenancy Audit Report **Date:** November 21, 2025 **Project:** LightRAG **Auditor:** GitHub Copilot ## Executive Summary The current multi-tenancy implementation in LightRAG relies on **application-level isolation**. While it provides helper classes (`TenantSQLBuilder`, `MongoTenantHelper`, etc.) to filter data by `tenant_id` and `kb_id`, it lacks **enforcement at the database or framework level**. This design is susceptible to data leaks if developers fail to use the helpers correctly. The "battle-tested" approach requires **Row-Level Security (RLS)** for PostgreSQL, **strict repository wrappers** for NoSQL stores, and **middleware-enforced tenant identification** (subdomains + JWT). ## Gap Analysis | Feature | Current Implementation | Battle-Tested Standard | Gap Severity | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | **Tenant Identification** | Headers (`X-Tenant-ID`) or JWT metadata. No subdomain support. | Subdomains (`tenant.app.com`) + JWT `tenant_id` claim. | **High** | | **PostgreSQL Isolation** | `WHERE` clause filtering via `TenantSQLBuilder`. | **Row-Level Security (RLS)** + Tenant UUID PK. | **Critical** | | **MongoDB Isolation** | Manual field filtering via `MongoTenantHelper`. | **Tenant-scoped Repository** or ODM Middleware (Beanie). | **High** | | **Neo4j/Memgraph Isolation** | Cypher query modification via helper. | **Tenant Session Wrapper** or Label Prefixing. | **High** | | **Vector DB Isolation** | Metadata filtering via helper. | **Tenant-scoped Repository** or Collection Separation. | **High** | | **Redis Isolation** | Key prefixing via `RedisTenantNamespace` (manual usage). | **Key Prefixing** enforced by wrapper/dependency. | **Medium** | | **Framework Enforcement** | Optional dependencies in routers. | **Global Middleware** + Dependency Injection. | **High** | ## Detailed Findings ### 1. Tenant Identification * **Current**: `lightrag/api/dependencies.py` extracts `tenant_id` from headers or JWT. * **Risk**: Clients can potentially spoof `X-Tenant-ID` if not strictly validated against the JWT. Subdomains are not used, making it harder to isolate tenants at the DNS/networking level (e.g., for CORS or cookies). ### 2. PostgreSQL * **Current**: `lightrag/kg/postgres_tenant_support.py` modifies SQL strings. * **Risk**: "Trusting the application code". A raw SQL query without the builder will leak data. RLS is the only way to prevent this at the database engine level. ### 3. MongoDB * **Current**: `lightrag/kg/mongo_tenant_support.py` provides helper methods. * **Risk**: Developers must remember to call `add_tenant_fields` and `get_tenant_filter`. ### 4. Neo4j * **Current**: `lightrag/kg/graph_tenant_support.py` injects `WHERE` clauses. * **Risk**: Complex Cypher queries might be difficult to parse and modify correctly. A session wrapper that enforces parameters is safer. ### 5. Redis * **Current**: `lightrag/kg/redis_tenant_support.py` provides `RedisTenantNamespace`. * **Risk**: Manual usage of the namespace wrapper is required. ### 6. Vector Databases (Qdrant, Milvus, FAISS, Nano) * **Current**: `lightrag/kg/vector_tenant_support.py` provides helper methods for metadata filtering and ID prefixing. * **Risk**: Similar to other NoSQL stores, developers must manually apply filters and metadata. * **Qdrant**: Relies on `must` conditions in filters. * **Milvus**: Relies on `expr` strings. * **FAISS**: Relies on index naming or metadata filtering (which can be slow if not optimized). * **Nano**: Relies on metadata filtering. ### 7. Other Graph Databases (Memgraph, NetworkX) * **Current**: `lightrag/kg/graph_tenant_support.py` covers these. * **Risk**: * **Memgraph**: Similar to Neo4j, relies on Cypher query modification. * **NetworkX**: In-memory graph. Isolation relies on creating subgraphs or filtering edges manually. If the graph is persisted, it needs careful handling. ## Recommendations 1. **Implement Subdomain Middleware**: Add middleware to resolve `tenant_id` from subdomains and validate it against Redis/DB. 2. **Enable PostgreSQL RLS**: * Add `tenant_id` to `current_setting`. * Enable RLS on all tables. * Create policies to enforce isolation. 3. **Refactor MongoDB Access**: Create a `MongoTenantRepo` class that wraps the collection and automatically applies filters. 4. **Refactor Neo4j/Memgraph Access**: Create a `GraphTenantSession` class that wraps the driver session. 5. **Refactor Vector DB Access**: Create a `VectorTenantRepo` class (or specific implementations) that wraps the client and enforces metadata/filtering. 6. **Global Dependency**: Ensure `get_tenant_context` is used globally or at the router level for all tenant-specific endpoints. ## Action Plan See `docs/action_plan/02-implementation-plan.md` for the detailed steps.